Label printers: How to make the right choice? – Finance Monthly

7 Min Read

Landing on the right industrial label printer is going to impact your operational efficiency, with identification errors potentially being reduced by up to 85%. Faster workflow and lower long-term costs are what drive people. For leaders who have convoluted identification requirements, be it in manufacturing or the laboratory, the decision means balancing immediate performance against the total cost of ownership. This guide helps decision-makers identify the best printer for your labelling requirements, in which you aim to balance performance and durability with the total cost of ownership.

Understanding volume & jobs-to-be-done

Printer selection starts with laying out your identification tasks and the expected throughput. Wire and cable identification usually requires narrow-format printing with good curved surfaces adhesion – perhaps 3,000 labels daily in manufacturing environments.

Asset and warehouse labeling usually has higher volume printing at 10,000+ labels per shift. So, there needs to be a focus on barcode quality with quick changeover between label sizes. Laboratory applications will of course need precise identification with chemical resistance, and usually at lower volumes – but importantly, it must have zero tolerance for degradation or misidentification.

Volume really influences form factor decisions – it’s not always the best option to go with the lowest chance of misidentification.

Environmental durability and operating conditions

While market location matters less, industrial environments matter more, as these place a lot of stress on both printers and labels. Temperature extremes, be it freezer storage at -40°C or engine compartments exceeding 150°C, will dictate both printer specs and media selection. Remember that chemical exposure requires appropriate IP ratings too, so IP54 for dust and splash protection in most facilities, but IP65 for washdown environments.

UV exposure is another consideration for outdoor applications, and vibration and shock resistance matter for portable printers used in field service.

It’s worth looking into thermal transfer printing, as this is known for durability and chemical resistance – making it ideal for long-term asset identification and regulatory compliance applications. Direct thermal can be cheaper for short-term labels like shipping and temporary identification, but it comes at the cost of less durability.

Resolution requirements will again depend on application specifics. Standard 300 dpi suffices for most barcode and text applications, while 600 dpi is needed for small component marking or detailed graphics. Colour printing adds complexity and cost, meaning it should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.

Media compatibility and width

If we’re being honest, material science is really what impacts label performance. Polyester has great chemical/temperature resistance (so it’s good for harsh environments), with vinyl offering more flexibility for curved surfaces. Paper is fine for basic identification needs at lower cost points.

Adhesive is then important for it to remain. Permanence isn’t always desired, as some use cases call for removable options for temporary identification. On-metal applications often require different adhesive chemistries than standard applications.

Form factor & throughput

Benchtop printers tend to deliver more output but require dedicated workspace and power connections while flexible portable printers are suited for field service (but lack speed and media capacity). Battery life, charging options and construction become the considerations.

Media changeover time has a bit impact on operational efficiency. Quick-change mechanisms can reduce changeover from 15 minutes to under 2 minutes, and these are suited for facilities managing multiple label types daily.

Connectivity and software integration

Modern facilities need integration with existing systems. USB is for basic connectivity, while Ethernet and Wi-Fi bring low latency and mobility respectively. Bluetooth is only for short-range mobile applications. Drivers become important for whether there’s native support for major ERP systems.

Automation readiness & scalability

Print-and-apply systems slash the need for manual application, and this in turn reduces labor costs and ramps up placement consistency. Serialization and encoding capabilities are a consideration for track-and-trace requirements, particularly in regulated industries, while RFID encoding options are good future-proofing options as they help with intelligent asset tracking.

Service support & cost analysis

Consumable costs per thousand labels vary more than you would think. Ribbon efficiency (label waste during changeover) and maintenance accumulate and compound over time, so you need to calculate three-year operating costs using consumables, service, and downtime impacts. Service level agreements and response times, along with spare parts availability, all play a role too.

Performance examples

A wire harness manufacturer who are implementing dedicated label printers for cable identification dramatically reduced changeover time by 30% and eliminated 80% of mislabeling incidents. The improvement came from standardizing on thermal transfer technology with quick-change media loading and integrated verification systems.

Meanwhile a pharmaceutical distribution center upgrading from generic desktop printers to industrial units designed for label printers for every industry achieved 40% faster processing speeds and reduced label waste by 60%. The facility identification system now maintains 99.9% scan accuracy across their sorting.

Selection checklist

Before finalising your decision, check these requirements:

  • Print volume aligns with rated throughput
  • Environmental specifications exceed your operating conditions with margin
  • Resolution meets minimum readability requirements for smallest applications
  • Media width accommodates your largest label requirements
  • Connectivity options support planned integration
  • Service support matches your operational continuity requirements
  • Three-year TCO fits budget constraints including all consumables
Share this Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version